1983. In some ways it was just another year that passed all too
quickly. But for folks with disabilities keeping an eye on "the tube" some
very interesting things began to happen.
CBS was broadcasting promotions for its new season. One showed a
paraplegic wheelchair racer. Another showed a deaf couple signing, "I love
you, I love you, too." People with disabilities in TV promotions! It was
something we had never seen before!
Oddly enough, some of the greatest media advances have come in
television commercials, the most conservative of all the
entertainment-industry fields. Following CBS's 1983 season came TV
commercials showing wheelchair users in Levi's jeans, children with
disabilities clapping away in McDonald's, we've seen employees in
wheelchairs in Wal-Mart commercials and in ads for cars and many other
products.
Before the mid-80's many product sponsors feared the presence of
individuals with visible handicaps would alienate consumers from their
products. Now, all that's changed. Not only are people with disabilities
used in commercials, it's become almost commonplace. And that's the great
thing about it. People with disabilities showcased for what they are ... kids
who go to McDonald's just like other kids, adults with disabilities who work
at the local store and shop for their cars just like anyone else would.
Normalcy... people with disabilities being just "regular folks".
There are still many media barriers that need breaking down. And
that's where people with disabilities need to make sure their voices are
heard. As an anchorwoman, who also happens to be paraplegic, I have the
insider/outsider view on how the media portray people with disabilities.
Perhaps the area that could use some extra attention to detail is
the vocabulary of disability. I know the reporters at WIS try to be very
thoughtful when it comes to portraying the hardships and barriers faced by
citizens who are disabled. But unless the person being interviewed speaks up
and offers suggestions for appropriate ways to describe people with
disabilities, the reporter may never know she or he has described someone in
a way that may make the person with the disability feel uncomfortable.
I know when stories have been done about me, I cringe a little when
the TV or newspaper reporter says I'm "confined" to a wheelchair or
"wheelchair bound". Sure I have to use a wheelchair, but my wheelchair is my
mobility, my liberation, my freedom to do my job, to go to the grocery store
or library... to be just "regular folks". The words "bound" and
"confined"... sound just that: bound and confined! That's not me, and that's
not most people with disabilities I know. I'd think to myself too late, "Why
didn't I suggest to the reporter that I prefer to think of myself not as
"wheelchair bound or confined" but as a person who uses a wheelchair as a
result of an automobile accident.
Actually, that's in keeping with Associated Press Guidelines
prepared for media professionals. They are invaluable to anyone who speaks,
writes, or thinks about people with disabilities.
A few examples from the guidelines are:
- Do not focus on a disability unless it is crucial to a story.
- Do not portray people with disabilities who succeed as
superhuman. Even though the public tends to admire super achievers,
portraying people with disabilities as superstars raises false expectations
that all people with disabilities should achieve at this level.
- Do not sensationalize a disability by saying afflicted with,
crippled with, suffers from, victim of, and so on. Instead, say person who
has multiple sclerosis, man who had (or contracted) polio.
- Do not label people as part of a disability group, such as the
retarded. Instead, say people with mental retardation.
- Put people first, not their disability. Say woman with arthritis,
children who are deaf, people with disabilities. This puts the focus on the
individual, not on a particular functional limitation.
These are just a few examples that the person who has a disability
can suggest as a preferable way of being "described" if they're the subject
of a TV story or newspaper article. Most reporters will probably welcome
suggestions: they want to be not only accurate, but sensitive as well.
If you object to the way a person with a disability is portrayed in
the media, let that TV station or magazine or newspaper know about it! A
thoughtful letter, e-mail or phone call will have a much bigger impact than
a hasty or angry one.
It will take a long time to break down all the stereotypes that
surround people with disabilities and guess who has to do most of the work?
You guessed it.... people with disabilities.